Prior to July, 1995, ZetaTalk stated Public Sightings of the inbound Planet X (aka 12th Planet or Nibiru) would not be assisted by NASA or observatories worldwide, but would be resisted. By 2002 this had been well documented, resistance to Viewing at observatories in 2001 followed by disinformation on the imaging in February, 2002 by Doctoring NEAT star charts to include the object found, as the sci.astro Debates demonstrate.
- Beyond the fact that assistance will not be given to anyone trying to locate this comet, is the resistance that will be given. The establishment knows it is there but fears the chaos that will erupt if the populace knows. Those in the establishment who are knowledgeable are personally planning escape routes and safe places, and will disappear when the time comes. Those who are knowledgeable and are concerned about getting the word out are brutally repressed. They know that any statements they make will be followed by personal discrediting, vicious in nature. Therefore, where individuals may locate what they think is the comet, they will not receive the assistance of those with access to high powered equipment, as all this equipment falls under the umbrella of the establishment in some way.
- ZetaTalk, Suppressing the Word
Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 22:02:20 -0500 Article: <3CD5F23C.3EE72A05@zetatalk.com> Subject: Re: Planet X Animated GIF
While the Neat NEAT Trick operators were "taking vacation" or otherwise not heard from, immediately after the Jan 19th announcment, and then the NEAT images were either unavailable to be downloaded or had serious errors in them so they could not be displayed ... In Article <3C7D2AA5.35E63605@zetatalk.com> Nancy Lieder wrote: > In Article <3C717603.C2015A6C@zetatalk.com> Nancy Lieder wrote: >> Steve Havas (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote: >>>> A second set of infrared images of Planet X was taken >>>> on Jan 19, 2002. The Haute-Provence Observatory .. >> >>> I see Dave Tholen has not made any comments yet... >>> Does this image speak for itself? >> >> Dave is waiting for instructions from his handlers. > > And he apparently GOT them! I received a note from > Steve Havas regarding a new NEAT image recently > taken and trumped by Tholen debunking the Jan 19th > imaging of Planet X, claiming that it also shows up a > year earlier. > > Nancy, when I was finally able to bring up the .fits > file of the NEAT image (2001-01-17) I was able to > confirm that they do show an existing object exactly > where the object is in the Jan 19/2002 image. The > other object that was shown on the Jan 19, 2002 > image (below and left when inverted and rotated) > is not present. > Steve Havas The OBVIOUS source of comparison was being overlooked! Open Minded's Jan 5th infrared image, compared to Pierre's Jan 19th infrared image, of which we have the ORIGINAL .FITS from the CCD camera. On Jan 5th, the object identified by the Zetas is NOT at the Jan 19th location, and on Jan 19th, the object identified by Pierre is NOT at the Jan 5th location. Images: use90543.htm Images: use90548.htm This demonstrates that the NEAT images, if they show otherwise, have been doctored!